HEAD TO HEAD

BreachRx vs Conducttr: which crisis simulation platform fits your team?

THE SHORT ANSWER

On our published weights BreachRx and Conducttr tie at 6.75. BreachRx scores higher on executive and board focus, exercise delivery effort, measurement and after-action reporting and regulatory evidence; Conducttr scores higher on customisation and pricing clarity; they tie on scenario realism. The choice depends on which of those criteria matter more to you.

By The Exercise Desk · Crisis Simulation Ranked · Published 2026-10-11

Desk research from public vendor pages, vendor announcements and standards documents read between 27 September and 13 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not run any exercise on these platforms.

How do BreachRx and Conducttr score on each criterion?

BreachRx and Conducttr: crisis readiness score (editorial assessment, 0 to 10)
Criterion	Weight	BreachRx	Conducttr	Higher score
Scenario realism	20%	Rex AI's Exercise Agent builds organisation-specific scenarios around emerging threats, incident types, business units and dependencies, and live orchestration delivers scenario developments during the exercise; a scenario that branches on each decision is not described. Source: BreachRx: AI Tabletops (Rex Platform) · Read 13 Oct 2026	Simulates the information environment around players (news, social media and messaging) with role-specific content; adaptation depends on the facilitator. Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026	Tie
Executive and board focus	20%	Enterprise-wide exercises bring security, legal, privacy, IT, communications, risk, business leaders, executives and outside partners together, and reports include executive summaries; board dashboards are not described. Source: BreachRx: AI Tabletops (Rex Platform) · Read 13 Oct 2026	Crisis-team exercising at any scale, from one team to 1,000+, but general crisis software rather than built around a cyber board. Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026	BreachRx
Exercise delivery effort	15%	The Exercise Agent generates moderator guides, timelines, injects, decision points and participant materials, and the vendor names a monthly or biweekly cadence; a human moderator still runs the session. Source: BreachRx: AI Tabletops (Rex Platform) · Read 13 Oct 2026	You design the exercise in the Scenario Editor and facilitate it yourself; LISA drafts the events list. Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026	BreachRx
Measurement and after-action reporting	15%	After-action reports, executive summaries, gap analyses and prioritised improvements; gaps and observations are captured automatically and fed back into response workflows for a retest. Benchmarking across teams is not described. Source: BreachRx: Rex agentic AI · Read 13 Oct 2026	Real-time analytics and central reporting; quantitative behavioural assessment is the paid Assessment Toolkit. Source: Conducttr pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026	BreachRx
Regulatory evidence	10%	Cyber RegScout brings regulatory context into the exercise, updating tasks, deadlines and disclosure milestones as the scenario changes; mapping of results to named frameworks is not described on the pages reviewed. Source: BreachRx: Rex agentic AI · Read 13 Oct 2026	No framework or regulatory mapping of results is described on the pages reviewed. Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026	BreachRx
Customisation	10%	Scenarios are generated for the organisation's business units and dependencies and test its own response playbooks inside the Rex Platform. Source: BreachRx: AI Tabletops (Rex Platform) · Read 13 Oct 2026	Full authoring control in the Scenario Editor, with a template library in Conducttr Worlds. Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026	Conducttr
Pricing clarity	10%	No price published; the route in is a demo. A free, facilitated exercise is offered only to qualifying healthcare providers. Source: BreachRx homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026	Four annual licences published, £11,950 to £25,725 a year, plus the Assessment Toolkit from £4,536. Source: Conducttr pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026	Conducttr
Total	100%			Tie

Which stages of an exercise does each cover?

Build: Documented
The Rex AI Exercise Agent builds organisation-specific scenarios around emerging threats, incident types, business units and dependencies.
Source: BreachRx: AI Tabletops (Rex Platform) · Read 13 Oct 2026
Adapt: Partial
Live orchestration delivers scenario developments during the exercise; branching on each decision is not described.
Source: BreachRx: AI Tabletops (Rex Platform) · Read 13 Oct 2026
Seats: Documented
Enterprise-wide exercises for security, legal, privacy, IT, communications, risk, business leaders, executives and outside partners, or focused micro-exercises for one team.
Source: BreachRx: AI Tabletops (Rex Platform) · Read 13 Oct 2026
Run: Partial
Moderator guides, timelines and discussion prompts are generated; the free healthcare exercise is run by BreachRx facilitators.
Source: BreachRx blog: free tabletop exercise for healthcare providers (6 October 2026) · Read 13 Oct 2026
Report: Documented
After-action reports, executive summaries, gap analyses and prioritised improvements; gaps and observations are captured automatically.
Source: BreachRx: Rex agentic AI · Read 13 Oct 2026
Map: Partial
Cyber RegScout adds regulatory deadlines and disclosure milestones to the exercise; framework mapping of results is not described.
Source: BreachRx: Rex agentic AI · Read 13 Oct 2026

A solid segment means the vendor's own pages describe that stage. It shows coverage, not quality; the scores judge quality.

Build: Documented
You author the exercise in the Scenario Editor; LISA, a "text-to-MEL chatbot", drafts the master events list.
Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026
Adapt: Partial
Role-specific content changes under facilitator control; automatic branching on decisions is not described.
Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026
Seats: Documented
Runs from one team to more than 1,000 simultaneous teams, virtual, in person or hybrid.
Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026
Run: Partial
The organisation's own facilitator runs the exercise with the platform's tools.
Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026
Report: Partial
Real-time analytics and central reporting; quantitative behavioural assessment is the paid Assessment Toolkit.
Source: Conducttr pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026
Map: Not described
No framework or regulatory mapping of results is described on the pages reviewed.
Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

A solid segment means the vendor's own pages describe that stage. It shows coverage, not quality; the scores judge quality.

BreachRx documents 3 of 6 stages and Conducttr documents 2 of 6.

What do they cost?

BreachRx

Packaging: One module of the Rex Platform, alongside incident response management, Rex AI, out-of-band communications and Cyber RegScout; access through a demo.

Not published BreachRx publishes no prices and has no pricing page in its navigation; the route in is a demo. A free, facilitated exercise is offered to qualifying hospitals and healthcare providers (October 2026).

Source: BreachRx homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Conducttr

Packaging: Annual team licences, published by tier.

Four annual team licences: Raven £11,950, Hawk £16,465, Osprey £21,000 and Eagle £25,725 a year, each for up to 40 participants per session, in GBP excluding tax. Assessment Toolkit from £4,536 a year. Larger exercises and Conducttr Local are priced on request.

Source: Conducttr pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

Which frameworks do they map results to?

BreachRx

None named on the pages reviewed

Conducttr

None named on the pages reviewed

Which should you choose?

Choose BreachRx if

Executive and board focus: 8 / 10, Enterprise-wide exercises bring security, legal, privacy, IT, communications, risk, business leaders, executives and outside partners together, and reports include executive summaries; board dashboards are not described.
Measurement and after-action reporting: 8 / 10, After-action reports, executive summaries, gap analyses and prioritised improvements; gaps and observations are captured automatically and fed back into response workflows for a retest. Benchmarking across teams is not described.
Exercises inside an incident response platform

Choose Conducttr if

Customisation: 10 / 10, Full authoring control in the Scenario Editor, with a template library in Conducttr Worlds.
Pricing clarity: 10 / 10, Four annual licences published, £11,950 to £25,725 a year, plus the Assessment Toolkit from £4,536.
Teams that design every inject themselves

BreachRx profile Conducttr profile Alternatives to BreachRx Alternatives to Conducttr See them side by side

Frequently asked questions

Is BreachRx or Conducttr better for executive crisis exercises?

BreachRx scores higher on executive and board focus (8 against 7 out of 10). Read each profile for the detail.

Which is easier to run, BreachRx or Conducttr?

BreachRx scores higher on delivery effort, where a higher score means less effort, (7 against 5 out of 10). Read each profile for the detail.

Do BreachRx and Conducttr publish prices?

Conducttr publishes a price: Four annual team licences: Raven £11,950, Hawk £16,465, Osprey £21,000 and Eagle £25,725 a year, each for up to 40 participants per session, in GBP excluding tax. Assessment Toolkit from £4,536 a year. Larger exercises and Conducttr Local are priced on request. BreachRx does not publish a price for its exercise product.