HEAD TO HEAD
Cyberbit vs Cytactic: which crisis simulation platform fits your team?
THE SHORT ANSWER
By The Exercise Desk · Crisis Simulation Ranked · Published 2026-10-11
Desk research from public vendor pages, vendor announcements and standards documents read between 27 September and 13 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not run any exercise on these platforms.
How do Cyberbit and Cytactic score on each criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | Cyberbit | Cytactic | Higher score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario realism | 20% | Nonlinear exercises in which each answer changes the next step and SOC escalations trigger executive decisions. Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Exercises run in a Simulation Mode where attacker emails, ransom notes, breaking news and system data appear automatically, and the generator builds scenarios from the organisation's profile and data; a scenario that branches on each decision is not described. Source: Cytactic blog: the next generation of cyber tabletops (17 July 2026) · Read 13 Oct 2026 | Tie |
| Executive and board focus | 20% | Executive, legal, communications, risk and SOC teams in one connected exercise. Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Generated exercises include stakeholder discussions, and the platform has crisis communication and legal disclosure agents; an exercise format built for the board is not described on the pages reviewed. Source: Cytactic: platform · Read 13 Oct 2026 | Cyberbit |
| Exercise delivery effort | 15% | Sold only as an add-on to a Cyberbit Readiness plan, so the executive exercise arrives with a range programme. Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Five ready-made simulations plus an AI generator that drafts the scenario, injects, decision points and moderator guidance; a one-sentence edit updates every step. A moderator still runs the session. Source: Cytactic blog: the next generation of cyber tabletops (17 July 2026) · Read 13 Oct 2026 | Cytactic |
| Measurement and after-action reporting | 15% | A shared dashboard scores decision impact on continuity, reputation and response. Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Post-simulation reports "turn insights into action" and readiness assessments are available; what is measured is not described in detail. Source: Cytactic: platform · Read 13 Oct 2026 | Tie |
| Regulatory evidence | 10% | References NIST and the CREW framework; no regulatory reporting is described. Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Regulator-ready records are a stated platform pillar and a Legal Disclosures AI Agent is part of the platform; mapping of results to named frameworks is not described on the pages reviewed. Source: Cytactic homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026 | Cytactic |
| Customisation | 10% | How scenarios are authored or tailored is not described on the pages reviewed. Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Scenarios are generated from the organisation's own profile and data, edited in plain language, alongside a Playbook Builder. Source: Cytactic blog: the next generation of cyber tabletops (17 July 2026) · Read 13 Oct 2026 | Cytactic |
| Pricing clarity | 10% | No price published. Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026 | No price published; the route in is a demo. Source: Cytactic homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026 | Tie |
| Total | 100% | Cytactic |
Which stages of an exercise does each cover?
Build: Not described
How a scenario is authored or tailored is not described on the pages reviewed.
Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026
Adapt: Documented
Exercises can be linear or nonlinear; in nonlinear mode each answer changes what comes next, and technical escalations trigger executive decisions.
Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026
Seats: Documented
Executive, legal, communications, risk and SOC teams in one connected exercise.
Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026
Run: Not described
Facilitation is not described on the pages reviewed.
Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026
Report: Partial
A shared dashboard scores the impact of decisions on continuity, reputation and response.
Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026
Map: Partial
The page references NIST and the CREW framework.
Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026
Build: Documented
Five production-ready simulations plus an AI engine that builds new ones from the organisation's profile and data.
Source: Cytactic blog: the next generation of cyber tabletops (17 July 2026) · Read 13 Oct 2026
Adapt: Partial
Attacker emails, ransom notes, breaking news and system data appear automatically in Simulation Mode; branching on each decision is not described.
Source: Cytactic blog: the next generation of cyber tabletops (17 July 2026) · Read 13 Oct 2026
Seats: Partial
Generated exercises include stakeholder discussions; formats built for executives or the board are not described on the pages reviewed.
Source: Cytactic: platform · Read 13 Oct 2026
Run: Partial
Moderator guidance is generated; the session is moderated by the organisation.
Source: Cytactic blog: the next generation of cyber tabletops (17 July 2026) · Read 13 Oct 2026
Report: Partial
Post-simulation reports; what is measured is not described in detail.
Source: Cytactic: platform · Read 13 Oct 2026
Map: Partial
Regulator-ready records are a stated pillar; named framework mapping is not described.
Source: Cytactic homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026
Cyberbit documents 2 of 6 stages and Cytactic documents 1 of 6.
What do they cost?
Cyberbit
Packaging: Crisis Sim 360 is "only offered as an add-on" to a Cyberbit Readiness plan.
Not published No prices published; the pricing URL returned a 404 when we checked.
Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026
Cytactic
Packaging: Part of the Cytactic incident response management platform, alongside playbooks, decision support, communication and disclosure agents; access through a demo.
Not published Cytactic publishes no prices and has no pricing page in its navigation; the route in is a demo.
Source: Cytactic homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026
Which frameworks do they map results to?
Cyberbit
- NIST
- CREW framework
Source: Cyberbit: Crisis Sim 360 · Read 27 Sep 2026
Cytactic
None named on the pages reviewed
Which should you choose?
Choose Cyberbit if
- Executive and board focus: 8 / 10, Executive, legal, communications, risk and SOC teams in one connected exercise.
- Scenario realism: 7 / 10, Nonlinear exercises in which each answer changes the next step and SOC escalations trigger executive decisions.
- Linking a cyber range to executive decisions
Choose Cytactic if
- Customisation: 8 / 10, Scenarios are generated from the organisation's own profile and data, edited in plain language, alongside a Playbook Builder.
- Scenario realism: 7 / 10, Exercises run in a Simulation Mode where attacker emails, ransom notes, breaking news and system data appear automatically, and the generator builds scenarios from the organisation's profile and data; a scenario that branches on each decision is not described.
- Simulations inside a cyber incident response hub
Cyberbit profileCytactic profileAlternatives to CyberbitAlternatives to CytacticSee them side by side
Frequently asked questions
Is Cyberbit or Cytactic better for executive crisis exercises?
Cyberbit scores higher on executive and board focus (8 against 7 out of 10). Read each profile for the detail.
Which is easier to run, Cyberbit or Cytactic?
Cytactic scores higher on delivery effort, where a higher score means less effort, (7 against 5 out of 10). Read each profile for the detail.
Do Cyberbit and Cytactic publish prices?
Neither Cyberbit nor Cytactic publishes a price for its exercise product.